Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    8,237.72
    -34.74 (-0.42%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,442.35
    -56.35 (-0.27%)
     
  • AIM

    772.57
    +0.19 (+0.02%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1818
    -0.0004 (-0.03%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2636
    -0.0024 (-0.19%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    50,727.68
    -139.13 (-0.27%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,321.49
    -38.84 (-2.86%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,464.62
    -8.55 (-0.16%)
     
  • DOW

    39,150.33
    +15.53 (+0.04%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    80.59
    -0.14 (-0.17%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,334.70
    +3.50 (+0.15%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,596.47
    -36.53 (-0.09%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,028.52
    -306.78 (-1.67%)
     
  • DAX

    18,163.52
    -90.68 (-0.50%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,628.57
    -42.77 (-0.56%)
     

With 74% institutional ownership, DoorDash, Inc. (NASDAQ:DASH) is a favorite amongst the big guns

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies DoorDash's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership

  • Insiders have been selling lately

If you want to know who really controls DoorDash, Inc. (NASDAQ:DASH), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 74% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of DoorDash.

See our latest analysis for DoorDash

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DoorDash?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in DoorDash. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at DoorDash's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in DoorDash. Our data shows that Sequoia Capital Operations LLC is the largest shareholder with 7.7% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.6% and 6.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Tony Xu directly holds 2.4% of the total shares outstanding.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of DoorDash

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

We can report that insiders do own shares in DoorDash, Inc.. Insiders own US$3.1b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Equity Ownership

With a stake of 7.7%, private equity firms could influence the DoorDash board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with DoorDash , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.