Advertisement
UK markets open in 3 hours 49 minutes
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,913.48
    +296.38 (+0.77%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,905.02
    -290.58 (-1.51%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    77.01
    -0.56 (-0.72%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,371.20
    -21.70 (-0.91%)
     
  • DOW

    39,671.04
    -201.95 (-0.51%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    54,553.34
    -426.03 (-0.77%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,510.67
    -15.74 (-1.03%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    16,801.54
    -31.08 (-0.18%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,560.55
    -23.85 (-0.52%)
     

Is Aerison Group Ltd's (ASX:AE1) 16% ROE Better Than Average?

One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. We'll use ROE to examine Aerison Group Ltd (ASX:AE1), by way of a worked example.

Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.

See our latest analysis for Aerison Group

How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?

The formula for ROE is:

ADVERTISEMENT

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Aerison Group is:

16% = AU$5.4m ÷ AU$34m (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2021).

The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. Another way to think of that is that for every A$1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn A$0.16 in profit.

Does Aerison Group Have A Good ROE?

Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. As is clear from the image below, Aerison Group has a better ROE than the average (12%) in the Construction industry.

roe
roe

That's what we like to see. With that said, a high ROE doesn't always indicate high profitability. Especially when a firm uses high levels of debt to finance its debt which may boost its ROE but the high leverage puts the company at risk. To know the 3 risks we have identified for Aerison Group visit our risks dashboard for free.

How Does Debt Impact ROE?

Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.

Combining Aerison Group's Debt And Its 16% Return On Equity

Aerison Group has a debt to equity ratio of 0.43, which is far from excessive. The fact that it achieved a fairly good ROE with only modest debt suggests the business might be worth putting on your watchlist. Conservative use of debt to boost returns is usually a good move for shareholders, though it does leave the company more exposed to interest rate rises.

Summary

Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.

But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. Check the past profit growth by Aerison Group by looking at this visualization of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

But note: Aerison Group may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.