Advertisement
UK markets close in 6 hours 52 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,109.20
    +30.34 (+0.38%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,801.35
    +199.37 (+1.02%)
     
  • AIM

    755.95
    +2.83 (+0.38%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1653
    -0.0003 (-0.03%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2530
    +0.0019 (+0.15%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    51,397.54
    +456.23 (+0.90%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,390.08
    -6.45 (-0.46%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,048.42
    -23.21 (-0.46%)
     
  • DOW

    38,085.80
    -375.12 (-0.98%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.74
    +0.17 (+0.20%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,357.90
    +15.40 (+0.66%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,651.15
    +366.61 (+2.12%)
     
  • DAX

    18,052.73
    +135.45 (+0.76%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,042.79
    +26.14 (+0.33%)
     

Is Crest Nicholson Holdings plc (LON:CRST) An Attractive Dividend Stock?

Dividend paying stocks like Crest Nicholson Holdings plc (LON:CRST) tend to be popular with investors, and for good reason - some research suggests a significant amount of all stock market returns come from reinvested dividends. On the other hand, investors have been known to buy a stock because of its yield, and then lose money if the company's dividend doesn't live up to expectations.

With a six-year payment history and a 9.1% yield, many investors probably find Crest Nicholson Holdings intriguing. We'd agree the yield does look enticing. There are a few simple ways to reduce the risks of buying Crest Nicholson Holdings for its dividend, and we'll go through these below.

Explore this interactive chart for our latest analysis on Crest Nicholson Holdings!

LSE:CRST Historical Dividend Yield, July 26th 2019
LSE:CRST Historical Dividend Yield, July 26th 2019

Payout ratios

Companies (usually) pay dividends out of their earnings. If a company is paying more than it earns, the dividend might have to be cut. As a result, we should always investigate whether a company can afford its dividend, measured as a percentage of a company's net income after tax. In the last year, Crest Nicholson Holdings paid out 62% of its profit as dividends. This is a healthy payout ratio, and while it does limit the amount of earnings that can be reinvested in the business, there is also some room to lift the payout ratio over time.

ADVERTISEMENT

In addition to comparing dividends against profits, we should inspect whether the company generated enough cash to pay its dividend. Crest Nicholson Holdings paid out 92% of its free cash flow last year, suggesting the dividend is poorly covered by cash flow. Crest Nicholson Holdings paid out less in dividends than it reported in profits, but unfortunately it didn't generate enough free cash flow to cover the dividend. Cash is king, as they say, and were Crest Nicholson Holdings to repeatedly pay dividends that aren't well covered by cashflow, we would consider this a warning sign.

We update our data on Crest Nicholson Holdings every 24 hours, so you can always get our latest analysis of its financial health, here.

Dividend Volatility

One of the major risks of relying on dividend income, is the potential for a company to struggle financially and cut its dividend. Not only is your income cut, but the value of your investment declines as well - nasty. Looking at the data, we can see that Crest Nicholson Holdings has been paying a dividend for the past six years. It's good to see that Crest Nicholson Holdings has been paying a dividend for a number of years. However, the dividend has been cut at least once in the past, and we're concerned that what has been cut once, could be cut again. During the past six-year period, the first annual payment was UK£0.065 in 2013, compared to UK£0.33 last year. This works out to be a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 31% a year over that time. The dividends haven't grown at precisely 31% every year, but this is a useful way to average out the historical rate of growth.

Crest Nicholson Holdings has grown distributions at a rapid rate despite cutting the dividend at least once in the past. Companies that cut once often cut again, but it might be worth considering if the business has turned a corner.

Dividend Growth Potential

With a relatively unstable dividend, it's even more important to evaluate if earnings per share (EPS) are growing - it's not worth taking the risk on a dividend getting cut, unless you might be rewarded with larger dividends in future. It's good to see Crest Nicholson Holdings has been growing its earnings per share at 14% a year over the past 5 years. Crest Nicholson Holdings's earnings per share have grown rapidly in recent years, although more than half of its profits are being paid out as dividends, which makes us wonder if the company has a limited number of reinvestment opportunities in its business.

Conclusion

When we look at a dividend stock, we need to form a judgement on whether the dividend will grow, if the company is able to maintain it in a wide range of economic circumstances, and if the dividend payout is sustainable. First, the company has a payout ratio that was within an average range for most dividend stocks, but it paid out virtually all of its generated cash flow. Unfortunately, the company has not been able to generate earnings per share growth, and cut its dividend at least once in the past. Ultimately, Crest Nicholson Holdings comes up short on our dividend analysis. It's not that we think it is a bad company - just that there are likely more appealing dividend prospects out there on this analysis.

Earnings growth generally bodes well for the future value of company dividend payments. See if the 10 Crest Nicholson Holdings analysts we track are forecasting continued growth with our free report on analyst estimates for the company.

Looking for more high-yielding dividend ideas? Try our curated list of dividend stocks with a yield above 3%.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.