Yahoo Finance Individual investors account for 41% of New Pacific Metals Corp.'s (TSE:NUAG) ownership, while public companies account for 38%
Key Insights
Significant control over New Pacific Metals by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
Every investor in New Pacific Metals Corp. (TSE:NUAG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 41% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
And public companies on the other hand have a 38% ownership in the company.
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of New Pacific Metals.
Check out our latest analysis for New Pacific Metals
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About New Pacific Metals?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in New Pacific Metals. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at New Pacific Metals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Hedge funds don't have many shares in New Pacific Metals. Silvercorp Metals Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 26% of shares outstanding. Pan American Silver Corp. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Rui Feng holds about 6.2% of the company stock.
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
Insider Ownership Of New Pacific Metals
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in New Pacific Metals Corp.. In their own names, insiders own CA$39m worth of stock in the CA$536m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
General Public Ownership
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 41% stake in New Pacific Metals. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
Public Company Ownership
We can see that public companies hold 38% of the New Pacific Metals shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
Next Steps:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with New Pacific Metals (including 2 which are potentially serious) .
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
