Advertisement
UK markets close in 4 hours 28 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,116.40
    +37.54 (+0.46%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,829.54
    +227.56 (+1.16%)
     
  • AIM

    755.53
    +2.41 (+0.32%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1659
    +0.0002 (+0.02%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2514
    +0.0003 (+0.03%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    51,228.88
    +519.98 (+1.03%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,386.39
    -10.15 (-0.73%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,048.42
    -23.21 (-0.46%)
     
  • DOW

    38,085.80
    -375.12 (-0.98%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    84.11
    +0.54 (+0.65%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,359.90
    +17.40 (+0.74%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,651.15
    +366.61 (+2.12%)
     
  • DAX

    18,049.43
    +132.15 (+0.74%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,039.15
    +22.50 (+0.28%)
     

Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In Lark Distilling Co. Ltd (ASX:LRK)?

A look at the shareholders of Lark Distilling Co. Ltd (ASX:LRK) can tell us which group is most powerful. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

Lark Distilling is a smaller company with a market capitalization of AU$156m, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutional investors have not yet purchased shares. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Lark Distilling.

See our latest analysis for Lark Distilling

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lark Distilling?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

ADVERTISEMENT

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Lark Distilling might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lark Distilling. The company's largest shareholder is Bruce Neill, with ownership of 10%. With 8.6% and 6.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Christopher Malcolm and Ace Cosmo Developments Limited are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Geoff Bainbridge directly holds 5.5% of the total shares outstanding.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Lark Distilling

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Lark Distilling Co. Ltd. Insiders own AU$55m worth of shares in the AU$156m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 46% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over Lark Distilling. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 6.5% stake in Lark Distilling. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 12%, of the Lark Distilling stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lark Distilling better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Lark Distilling that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.