Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    8,237.72
    -34.74 (-0.42%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,442.35
    -56.35 (-0.27%)
     
  • AIM

    772.57
    +0.19 (+0.02%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1821
    -0.0001 (-0.01%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2639
    -0.0021 (-0.17%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    50,720.79
    -125.07 (-0.25%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,322.22
    -38.11 (-2.80%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,464.62
    -8.55 (-0.16%)
     
  • DOW

    39,150.33
    +15.53 (+0.04%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    80.59
    -0.14 (-0.17%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,334.70
    +3.50 (+0.15%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,596.47
    -36.53 (-0.09%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,028.52
    -306.78 (-1.67%)
     
  • DAX

    18,163.52
    -90.68 (-0.50%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,628.57
    -42.77 (-0.56%)
     

Institutional investors own a significant stake of 43% in BrightView Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:BV)

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in BrightView Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders

  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business

Every investor in BrightView Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:BV) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of BrightView Holdings.

See our latest analysis for BrightView Holdings

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About BrightView Holdings?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in BrightView Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at BrightView Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in BrightView Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is KKR & Co. Inc., with ownership of 35%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.9% and 4.3% of the stock. In addition, we found that Dale Asplund, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of BrightView Holdings

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

We can see that insiders own shares in BrightView Holdings, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$50m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in BrightView Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Equity Ownership

With an ownership of 35%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand BrightView Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - BrightView Holdings has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit concerning) we think you should know about.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.