Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    8,311.41
    -35.94 (-0.43%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    21,048.91
    -45.25 (-0.21%)
     
  • AIM

    774.27
    -0.52 (-0.07%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1734
    +0.0023 (+0.20%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2945
    +0.0092 (+0.71%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    46,045.61
    +326.41 (+0.71%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,308.28
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,554.25
    +11.03 (+0.20%)
     
  • DOW

    40,659.76
    +96.70 (+0.24%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    76.60
    -1.56 (-2.00%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,546.20
    +53.80 (+2.16%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,062.67
    +1,336.03 (+3.64%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,430.16
    +321.02 (+1.88%)
     
  • DAX

    18,322.40
    +139.16 (+0.77%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,449.70
    +26.33 (+0.35%)
     

Institutional owners may consider drastic measures as Snowflake Inc.'s (NYSE:SNOW) recent US$2.4b drop adds to long-term losses

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Snowflake's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders

  • Recent purchases by insiders

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Snowflake Inc. (NYSE:SNOW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 60% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$2.4b. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 25% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called “market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in Snowflake's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Snowflake, beginning with the chart below.

Check out our latest analysis for Snowflake

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Snowflake?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Snowflake. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Snowflake's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Snowflake. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 6.4% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.8% and 3.1% of the stock.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Snowflake

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Snowflake Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$2.6b. we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Snowflake , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com