Advertisement
UK markets open in 52 minutes
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,508.47
    +166.93 (+0.42%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,784.50
    +68.03 (+0.38%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.30
    +0.56 (+0.69%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,337.00
    +0.40 (+0.02%)
     
  • DOW

    39,164.06
    +36.26 (+0.09%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    48,672.13
    +596.05 (+1.24%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,282.08
    -1.75 (-0.14%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    17,858.68
    +53.53 (+0.30%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,460.27
    -20.39 (-0.46%)
     

Institutions own 17% of Stanmore Resources Limited (ASX:SMR) shares but private companies control 59% of the company

Key Insights

  • Stanmore Resources' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public

  • The largest shareholder of the company is Star Success Pte Ltd with a 59% stake

  • Institutional ownership in Stanmore Resources is 17%

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Stanmore Resources Limited (ASX:SMR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Institutions, on the other hand, account for 17% of the company's stockholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stanmore Resources.

Check out our latest analysis for Stanmore Resources

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stanmore Resources?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Stanmore Resources. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Stanmore Resources, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

It would appear that 7.6% of Stanmore Resources shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Star Success Pte Ltd with 59% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.6% and 4.8% of the stock. Matthew Latimore, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Stanmore Resources

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

We can see that insiders own shares in Stanmore Resources Limited. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around AU$145m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Stanmore Resources. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 59%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Stanmore Resources better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Stanmore Resources (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com