Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    8,164.12
    -15.56 (-0.19%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,286.03
    -45.77 (-0.23%)
     
  • AIM

    764.38
    -0.09 (-0.01%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1796
    -0.0009 (-0.07%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2646
    +0.0005 (+0.04%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    48,624.18
    +508.78 (+1.06%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,277.40
    -6.42 (-0.50%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,460.48
    -22.39 (-0.41%)
     
  • DOW

    39,118.86
    -45.20 (-0.12%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    81.46
    -0.28 (-0.34%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,336.90
    +0.30 (+0.01%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,583.08
    +241.54 (+0.61%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,718.61
    +2.14 (+0.01%)
     
  • DAX

    18,235.45
    +24.90 (+0.14%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,479.40
    -51.32 (-0.68%)
     

Lotus Resources Limited's (ASX:LOT) largest shareholders are retail investors with 45% ownership, institutions own 32%

Key Insights

  • Lotus Resources' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public

  • 50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders

  • Insiders own 12% of Lotus Resources

A look at the shareholders of Lotus Resources Limited (ASX:LOT) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 45% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Meanwhile, institutions make up 32% of the company’s shareholders. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lotus Resources.

Check out our latest analysis for Lotus Resources

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lotus Resources?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that Lotus Resources does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lotus Resources, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Lotus Resources is not owned by hedge funds. Grant Burnaford Davey is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.2% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.2% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Keith Bowes, the CEO has 0.6% of the shares allocated to their name.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Lotus Resources

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Lotus Resources Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$650m, and insiders have AU$80m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 45% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lotus Resources. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 10%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Lotus Resources is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those shouldn't be ignored...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com