Advertisement
UK markets close in 1 minute
  • FTSE 100

    8,188.36
    +24.24 (+0.30%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,281.24
    -4.79 (-0.02%)
     
  • AIM

    766.05
    +1.67 (+0.22%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1782
    -0.0014 (-0.12%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2639
    -0.0008 (-0.07%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    49,709.18
    +1,015.20 (+2.08%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,305.39
    +3.32 (+0.25%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,462.61
    +2.13 (+0.04%)
     
  • DOW

    39,143.65
    +24.79 (+0.06%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.58
    +1.04 (+1.28%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,338.00
    -1.60 (-0.07%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,631.06
    +47.98 (+0.12%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,718.61
    +2.11 (+0.01%)
     
  • DAX

    18,324.13
    +88.68 (+0.49%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,586.09
    +106.69 (+1.43%)
     

Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PANW) high institutional ownership speaks for itself as stock continues to impress, up 5.8% over last week

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Palo Alto Networks' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company

  • Insiders have sold recently

A look at the shareholders of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ:PANW) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 78% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Last week’s 5.8% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 33%.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Palo Alto Networks, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for Palo Alto Networks

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Palo Alto Networks?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Palo Alto Networks. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Palo Alto Networks, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Palo Alto Networks. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.8% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Palo Alto Networks

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$1.0b worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Palo Alto Networks. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Palo Alto Networks better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Palo Alto Networks (including 1 which is significant) .

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com