Advertisement
UK markets close in 3 hours 51 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,218.37
    +38.69 (+0.47%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,378.08
    +46.28 (+0.23%)
     
  • AIM

    765.77
    +1.30 (+0.17%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1815
    +0.0010 (+0.08%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2642
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    48,754.36
    +348.15 (+0.72%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,284.56
    +0.73 (+0.06%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,482.87
    +4.97 (+0.09%)
     
  • DOW

    39,164.06
    +36.26 (+0.09%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.43
    +0.69 (+0.84%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,345.10
    +8.50 (+0.36%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,583.08
    +241.54 (+0.61%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,718.61
    +2.14 (+0.01%)
     
  • DAX

    18,286.71
    +76.16 (+0.42%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,491.96
    -38.76 (-0.51%)
     

Both individual investors who control a good portion of QuickLogic Corporation (NASDAQ:QUIK) along with institutions must be dismayed after last week's 10% decrease

Key Insights

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in QuickLogic indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy

  • 34% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders

  • Insiders have sold recently

A look at the shareholders of QuickLogic Corporation (NASDAQ:QUIK) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 60% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Following a 10% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but institutions who own 32% stock also took a hit.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about QuickLogic.

See our latest analysis for QuickLogic

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About QuickLogic?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

We can see that QuickLogic does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see QuickLogic's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in QuickLogic. Ben Andrews Revocable Trust is currently the largest shareholder, with 5.3% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 3.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Brian Faith is the owner of 1.3% of the company's shares.

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of QuickLogic

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

We can see that insiders own shares in QuickLogic Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$153m, and insiders have US$4.7m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 60% stake in QuickLogic, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 5.4%, of the QuickLogic stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand QuickLogic better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with QuickLogic (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com